GLBTQ: Combined Gay News Headlines (T5T-1)

After last year's much lauded razzle-dazzle Oscar-hosting gig, noted bisexual actor Hugh Jackman has turned down an offer for a repeat performance. Sad! CONTINUED Â» Permalink | Post a comment | Add to del.icio.us Tagged: Academy Awards, Adam Shankman, Hugh Jackman, Neil Patrick Harris, Oscars

SOUNDBITES — "We know the N-word is unacceptable, that's not disputable — but faggot? I'm learning that there's a segment of our society that finds it offensive and that it should not be used. I didn't realize that, but I do know now." —Peter Schafer, sports agent to "faggot" tweeter and Kansas City Chiefs running [...]

In a artfully orchestrated Friday news dump, the White House filed court papers in Massachusetts' Attorney General Martha Coakley's lawsuit against the federal government, claiming the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. Ready for DoJ's unsurprising reply? CONTINUED Â» Permalink | Post a comment | Add to del.icio.us Tagged: Barack Obama, Discrimination, DOMA, Lawsuits, Marriage, martha coakley, Massachusetts

Wow.Â That’s all I can say.Â This week’s Halloween party at Starline was OFF DA’ HOOK!!!!Â It was our best night yet all the way around.Â Our previous best was 268 and we blew the doors off that record with 306 in attendance throughout the night!Â Special thanks to the Starline staff for helping up [...]

For wh[For whatever reason for the pastÂ two decades the United States hasn’t allowed people with HIV or AIDs into this country. Granted we also don’t let gay people donate blood because, y’know, queers all have HIV. Today though that first issue was rectified by President Obama signing the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Act. From the [...]

Just got the following email and video from my very good friends at Maine Civil Liberties Union:

Because Freedom Can't Protect Itself.
Marriage Equality is about equal protection under the law, but it's also about love.
Click on the image below to watch a video about Jill, who wants to marry Diane. Or you can watch the video by clicking here.
Vote No On 1 on Tuesday.
Thanks for all that you do,
Alysia, Brianna, Claire, Edward, Katy, Shenna, Zach

Meet OUR friend and fellow Mainer Jill Barkley- she wants to marry Diane Hitchcock.

So right now, she needs to ask Maine's permission to marry Diane...

YOU can help Jill.

Take this VIRAL- Facebook, Twitter, etc.

Here's a TinyURL: http://tinyurl.com/yckogvs

Now.

Go! :)

And if you want to help more, please click here!

From my inbox:

Dear Louise,
We've seen time and time again our opponents claim that Mainers of faith are opposed to marriage equality.
That's just not true.
Equality is a value - like fairness and justice - that's deeply held by many men and women of faith around Maine.
So after we're done canvassing for equality, phoning for equality, and driving for equality, NO on 1 supporters of faith are coming together to hold a vigil for equality.
Please join us for one of the interfaith candlelight vigils across the state on Sunday, November 1 on behalf of all Maine families.

Portland
Williston West UCC
32 Thomas Street, Portland ME
5:00-6:00
RSVP on Facebook
Brunswick
Brunswick Commons
5:30-6:00
RSVP on Facebook
Kennebunk
First Parish UU
114 Main Street, Kennebunk ME
5:00-5:30
RSVP on Facebook
Augusta
UU Church of Augusta
69 Winthrop Street, Augusta ME
4:00-4:30
RSVP on Facebook
Auburn
First Universalist Church of Auburn
169 Pleasant Street, Auburn ME
Spring Street Lawn
5:00-5:30
RSVP on Facebook
Bangor
St. Patrick's Church
21 Holyoke Street, Brewer ME
5:00-5:30
RSVP on Facebook

I was just poking around over at the Approve 71 web page, and wow! Take a look at the list of Approve 71 Letters to the Editor on their Press Room page. This list is meaningful in several ways.

First, letter-writing Approve 71 supporters live all over the state (see map), not just in the Seattle-Olympia corridor as the opposition likes to allege. And interestingly, the reject letters I've seen came from some of the more densely populated cities and urban areas, not from some mythical conservative rural paradise.

Second, the Approve 71 letters greatly outnumber the other kind. Now of course you can't tell that from the Approve 71 web site because the opposition letters aren't printed there, but I've been keeping close tabs myself on publications from both sides, and I can say with certainty that the Approve 71 letters are vastly more numerous than the others.

With these thoughts in mind, it isn't at all surprising to me that the Domestic Partnership Expansion Law of 2009 (SB 5688) passed by the comfortable margin of 92 to 53 in the legislature. If numbers and distribution of letters to the editor has any validity as a straw poll, the legislature was quite simply enacting the will of the people when they passed this law.

For fun, I've pilfered the Approve 71 list of LTEs wholesale and reproduced it below, although you'll have to go to the Approve 71 web site for links if you want to read the actual letters. But have a look below and understand that treating all Washington families equally is a something that a plurality of Washingtonians fundamentally agree on. Now all we have to do is make sure that they get out and vote their convictions.
So as not to blow out the system, I've only included letters posted since Referendum 71 qualified for the ballot on September 3rd.

The Olympian | Friday, October 30, 2009
Ref. 71 offers practical benefits to all
This letter is addressed to those Washingtonians who, like me, are committed to living out their faith and support the rights of the nearly 12,000 registered domestic partners in our state. These are people who seek fair treatment and simply want the same legal protections so many others already enjoy.
- Rev. Mark Dowdy, Senior Pastor, The United Churches of Olympia, Presbyterian (USA) and United Church of Christ
The Bulletin, Gonzaga University | Friday, October 30, 2009
In search of logic: Referendum 71 opponents' campaign lacks reasoning, student says
A warning: This article does not promote gay marriage. It remains a mystery what person and under whose instruction placed a stack of what the Protect Marriage Washington campaign calls its doorbell flier pamphlets, in the lobby of Coughlin Hall last week.
- Edgar Loya, Gonzaga University
The Spokesman-Review | Friday, October 30, 2009
All people owed fairness
People are not guaranteed rights because they are black or white. People are not guaranteed rights because they are women or men. People are not guaranteed rights because they are gay or straight. People are guaranteed rights because they are individuals, because they are people.
- Nate Clemons, Spokane
Ballard News-Tribune | Friday, October 30, 2009
Approve Ref. 71
Last legislative session I proudly voted for Senate Bill 5688 - ensuring that all Washington families would be treated equally under state law, with the same protections and the same obligations as their neighbors.
- State Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, Ballard
The News Tribune | Friday, October 30, 3009
R-71: What's the point of denying rights to others?
Are we so overburdened with happiness in this world that we need to take special measures to increase the unhappiness of any two adults who find comfort living in each other's company? Joy to the world, folks. Joy to the world. Vote yes on Referendum 7endum 71.
- William Breitenbach, Tacoma
The News Tribune | Friday, October 30, 2009
R-71: Nation was founded upon the equality of all
When the American colonies declared independence, they also declared that all are created equal. Despite those bold words, anyone who wasn't male, white and a property owner was not truly equal.
- Kristin Gogerty, Puyallup
Kitsap Sun | Friday, October 30, 2009
A Persuasive and Thoughtful Letter for R-71
I would like to comment on the wonderfully written, compassionate, thoughtful letter in the Oct. 25 edition by Judi Edwards about Referendum 71.
- Beverly Smith, Port Orchard
The Bellingham Herald | Thursday, October 29, 2009
Says anti-referendum group is hypocritical
I am stunned by the hypocrisy of the reject R-71 campaign. They say that domestic partnership is a weighty issue that should not be decided by courts or the legislature. It must be put to a vote of the people - the best determiner of law.
- Janis Walworth, Bellingham
The Columbian | Thursday, October 29, 2009
Referendum strengthens community
The Protect Marriage Washington campaign has a video posted on its Web site that is so inaccurate it is funny.
- Ty Stober, Vancouver
Redmond Reporter | Thursday, October 29, 2009
Vote 'yes' on R-71
Please, give everyone the right to care for their loved ones. Please do not help to persecute those who have a different lifestyle. Please do not be afraid to bring about change. Fight for the freedom of all.
- Elizabeth Carlson, Redmond
The Pacific Northwest Inlander | Thursday, October 29, 2009
Basic Human Rights
As we drive around Spokane, we see many signs to Reject Ref. 71. But I wonder, do people really know what they are rejecting? You are rejecting rights for normal families and their children.
- Mary Layton, Spokane
Longview Daily News | Thursday, October 29, 2009
Approve Referendum 71
First and foremost. I am a married mother of two children. With that said, I was driving home from work Saturday when I crossed over the Allen Street bridge to see a group of people. Protesters. Now, I realize that everyone has the wonderful right to do this; however, I was appalled at what they protested.
- Mary Porter, Longview
The Olympian | Thursday, October 29, 2009
Yes on Referendum 71 is a vote for equality
Our state Legislature enacted new rights to a group who hadn't had those rights before. However, a referendum was sought by those who thought the legislature was not upholding the current social mores. The year was 1889. The Legislature granted women the right to vote. Sadly, this right wasn't upheld in a voter's referendum.
- Teresa Dominic, Olympia
Islands' Sounder | Wednesday, October 28, 3009
Approve Referendum 71
Your vote to approve Referendum 71 is your statement that all families in Washington are to be treated equally and fairly.
- Steering Committee, San Juan Island Chapter, ACLU of Washington
North Kitsap Herald | Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Referendum 71: It's not a vote about marriage
It was my partner of 26 years who helped me find the right word to describe the sensation we are both feeling: humiliation. For those fully integrated into society, it is difficult to imagine having both granted rights and the legitimacy of a committed relationship put up to a vote.
- Daniel J Hinkley, Indianola
The News Tribune | Wednesday, October 28, 2009
R-71: Not to worry; you can't catch homosexuality
As parents of a gay son, we can provide reassurance to those who fear that approving Referendum 71 will lead to the "glorification" of an "addictive lifestyle" (letter, 10-24).
- Gary KlGary Klauminzer and Eleanor Klauminzer, Gig Harbor
The Columbian | Wednesday, October 28, 2009
R-71 grants security to families
I am a lesbian living in Vancouver. I am the parent of two children, a grandparent and am "married" to my female partner. I work, go to church and love spending time with my family. The things I want in life are no different than any other parent, grandparent or married person. I want to take care of my family, and have the option for unpaid leave to take care of a critically ill partner.
- Joslyn Baker, Vancouver
The News Tribune | Wednesday, October 28, 2009
R-71: Committed love isn't dangerous to anyone
As the mother of a happily married gay man (married in Canada to his longtime partner), I cannot see how the passage of Referendum 71 could possibly do any harm to happily married heterosexual couples.
- Helen Holt, Lakewood
Issaquah Press | Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Vote 'approve' to respect the rights of everyone
Our founding fathers stated in the Declaration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
- Michael T. Barr, Sammamish
Seattle Post-Intelligencer | Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Google Endorses Approve 71
Google has a reputation for actively participating in policy debates surrounding information access, technology and energy. However, we do not generally take positions on social, legal or political issues that arise beyond our normal, day-to-day business. With that said, there are issues that are so important and so clear cut that we feel compelled to lend our voice. Supporting Referendum 71 is one of those issues.
- Brian Bershad - Engineering and Site Director, Google Seattle
- Scott Silver - Engineering and Site Director, Google Kirkland
The News Tribune | Tuesday, October 27, 2009
R-71: The fall of Rome can't be blamed on homosexuality
What happened to the Roman Empire? I am aware of very many attempts to answer this question. More than 200 years ago, Edward Gibbon memorably blamed the barbarians and the Christians for what he termed "the decline and fall of the Roman Empire." My high school gym teacher blamed a lack of physical fitness among the Romans. But in decades of study, I have yet to see any serious scholar blame something called "the homosexual lifestyle."
- David Lupher, Tacoma
The Columbian | Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Extend privilege to all citizens
Why on Earth should I insist my government give me unearned privileges over another taxpaying citizen because I'm heterosexual?
- Jeff Kerssen-Griep, Vancouver
Yakima Herald-Republic | Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Say no to hate and fear
Rallying outside the John Birch Society/Tea Party, I was reminded of the Rodgers and Hammerstein song, "You've Got To Be Carefully Taught."
- Mary Milam, Yakima
The Spokesman-Review | Friday, October 23, 2009
Seniors have a stake, too
I am curious as to why so fef many people are unaware that, beyond the gay issue, Referendum 71 is a benefit for unmarried heterosexual seniors, in that domestic partnerships mean that their hard-earned Social Security, military or pension benefits are not put at risk as they would be with a traditional marriage.
- Ruth Sweeney, Spokane
Bellevue Reporter | Saturday, October 24, 2009
Support R-71 - everyone deserves equal rights
As a religious minister, I urge the readers of the Bellevue Reporter to Approve Referendum 71 on the November ballot. Keep the Domestic Partnership Law.
- Rev. Joan Montagnes, East Shore Unitarian Church, Bellevue
The News Tribune | Monday, October 26, 2009
R-71: Real threat to residents is Initiative 1033, not R-71
Referendum 71 is in no way a threat to families and children. In fact, the opposite is true. What is a threat to families and children is teaching intolerance and the lack of compassion.
- Kristine Alskog Hall, Gig Harbor
The News Tribune | Monday, October 26, 2009
R-71: Tradition isn't good reason to vote no
Recent letters concerning Referendum 71 have made persuasive arguments as to why we should vote yes but have missed one key detail. The most compelling case to be made for R-71 and equal rights for same-sex couples is that there are no logical arguments against them.
- Rod Whittaker, Shelton
The Columbian | Sunday, October 25, 2009
R-71 is about legal partnerships
I have concerns about Larry S. Bowman Jr.'s Oct. 12 letter, "Where does this law lead to?" Referendum 71 isn't about marriage, it's about domestic partners. His letter rails against gay marriage, and yet I can remember a few years ago all the talk was about how people had no problems with equal rights, just don't call it "marriage." That's exactly what R-71 is about: equal rights.
- Larry Didier, Vancouver
The Bellingham Herald | Sunday, October 25, 2009
Rumors of religious intrusion untrue
I hear that there is a rumor being spread that if referendum 71 passes, my synagogue or church will be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies. That's not true - not even remotely possible.
- Rabbi Marti Leviel, Bellingham
The Olympian | Sunday, October 25, 2009
Support referendum to strengthen families
Revisiting the music of Peter, Paul & Mary, on the passing of Mary Travers, one finds the chorus of her duet with Holly Near of Sally Fingerett's "Home Is Where The Heart Is."
- Bob Findlay, Olympia
The Bellingham Herald | Sunday, October 25, 2009
Urges 'approve' votes on Referendum 71
Referendum 71 is the civil rights issue of this generation and I am passionately committed to ensuring that all couples have the same rights and protections that I enjoy as a married person in this state.
- Kim Glore, Bellingham
Kitsap Sun | Saturday, October 24, 2009
A Christian's Role in Supporting Referendum 71
I'm a married, heterosexual, Christian minister with eight grandchildren. I try to be a follower of Jesus, who said that we should care about the least, who challenged those in power and with special privileges, and who directed his ministry of love and acceptance to the less-privileged. Accordingly, I support Referendum 71.
- Judi Edwards, Bremerton
The News Tribune | Saturday, October 24, 2009
R-71: Love is all that matters in families
I work every day with women and children fleeing domestic violence. My work at the YWCA has taught me that all that mattat matters in a relationship is love.
- Miriam Barnett, Gig Harbor
Yakima Herald-Republic | Friday, October 23, 2009
Approve R-71
An Oct. 16 Associated Press article reports that a Louisiana judge still refuses to marry interracial couples. Astonishing, in this day and age? Apparently not, given that hundreds gathered in Yakima the previous evening to hear "Tea Party" speakers espousing much the same sort of bigotry.
- Gina King, Yakima
The Bellingham Herald | Thursday, October 22, 2009
Believes all couples should get benefits
As my own 43rd wedding anniversary approaches, I write to urge readers to vote "yes" on Referendum 71 in November.
- Chris Lilly Backus, Bellingham
The Columbian | Thursday, October 22, 2009
All families deserve equal treatment
I'm voting to approve Referendum 71 because I believe all families deserve to be treated equally and fairly under the law. This is about honoring family values for all types of families.
- Laura Ellsworth, Vancouver
The News Tribune | Thursday, October 22, 2009
R-71: Measure isn't about redefining marriage
R-71 opponents are disingenuous at best. At worst, they are lying outright.
- J. Matthew Phipps, Gig Harbor
South Whidbey Record | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Vote to help, vote yes on R-71
Our ballots have begun to arrive in mailboxes all over our area, and at this critical time in our history, I ask all voters to consider carefully the significance of their vote, the meaning of the act of voting and the importance of considering the outcomes of this act.
- Rev. Elizabeth "Kit" Ketcham, Minister, Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Whidbey Island
The Peninsula Gateway | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Vote yes on Referendum 71 to ensure equal benefit rights
My partner and I of 18 years have lived in Gig Harbor since 1991. As I drive around the area, going to the Costco or the YMCA, I am seeing signs for the reject Referundum 71 campaign. That saddens me.
- Rex Davison, Gig Harbor
The Bellingham Herald | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Referendum is a move toward justice
Any notion that domestic partners are demanding "special rights" is preposterous. The right to use family sick leave to care for one's seriously ill domestic partner, or the right to the death benefits when one's domestic partner is killed in the line of duty are examples of rights that other families already enjoy.
- Dan Thane and Christopher Chow, Lummi Island
Seattle Times | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Homosexuality is not a choice
Homosexuality is not a choice. I know this because I am heterosexual, and am not at all attracted to people of my own sex. And I am not choosing to be that way.
- Fred Godejohn, Seattle
Seattle Times | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Voting by the Golden Rule
In times of economic hardship, we should not impede the efforts of fellow citizens to care for their own. This is about equality and fairness, yes, but ultimately it is about the basic tenet of faith that you should treat others as you yourself would wish to be treated.
- Cary Toland, Seattle
The Spokesman-Review | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Rights shouldn't need votes
I've recently become engaged to the love of my life. Unfortunately, as we are trying to celebrate our love and plan our wedding, our joy has been unf n undercut by the struggle that our gay friends and family are fighting this November.
- Kyle Robinson, Spokane
The News Tribune | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
R-71: Yes vote honors concept, spirit of family
The annual Project Homeless Connect at the Tacoma Dome Exhibition Hall attracted about 1,600 homeless people, all from our local area (TNT, 10-15). Many came alone, and some arrived in small groups and families.
- Colleen Waterhouse, Lakewood
Port Townsend Leader | Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Referendum 71 represents fairness
I ask you to approve Referendum 71, which affirms the 2009 Domestic Partnership Bill. Why? It represents the fairness that is at the heart of American representative democracy.
- Karen Frank, Port Townsend
The Olympian | Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Referendum 71 is all about equality
As a pastor serving in local congregations in the Northwest for over 30 years, I often hear from people who are concerned about family values and strengthening the family. Members of religious communities and others who value strong families should vote "Yes" on Referendum 71.
- Rev. John Rosenberg, Tumwater
The News Tribune | Tuesday, October 20, 2009
R-71: Gays pay taxes but are denied equal rights
Lesbian and gay people pay taxes without being allowed full legal rights. So much hard work and generously paid taxes while their families were not protected and their rights frequently denied with heart-breaking regularity.
- Deborah Jordan, Tacoma
The News Tribune | Tuesday, October 20, 2009
R-71: Opponents try to have it both ways
I am amused by the "Statement Against" Referendum 71 in the Voters' Pamphlet.
- Mike Kenyon, Auburn
The Bellingham Herald | Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Vote for referendum helps support children
Children are suffering because their parents do not have access to the same rights and legal avenues that straight parents are availed.
- Cathy Campbell, Bellingham
The Bellingham Herald | Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Fairness requires referendum approval
Is fairness one of your values? Gay men and lesbians in Washington pay taxes like everyone else, but don't get treated like everyone else.
- Pat Fabiano, Bellingham
The Columbian | Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Protect civil rights; 'yes' on Ref. 71
Chuck Miller confuses me regarding his "defense of marriage" in his Oct. 8 letter, "Protect marriage; vote 'no' on Ref. 71." How can he defend marriage by refusing to let legal adults who love each other not have the same rights that he enjoys?
- Shelby Kenoyer, Vancouver
The Bellingham Herald | Monday, October 19, 2009
Support families, vote for referendum
Please help us keep the recent protections of domestic partnerships, such as family and medical leave, offered both gay and lesbian families and senior citizens by our state Legislature.
- Kate Miller, Bellingham
The Columbian | Monday, October 19, 2009
Senior citizens benefit from new law
As chair of the Advisory Council for the Southwest Washington Agency on Aging and Disabilities, I am particularly concerned about all matters that pertain to Washington's senior citizens.
- Maggie Culbertson, Battle Ground
The News Tribune | Monday, October 19, 2009
R-71: Measure embodies our founding principles <#xD;
American values: Equality. Freedom. Opportunity. Pursuit of happiness. E pluribus unum. Diversity. Unity. Thirteen states united into one.
- Annie Russell, Gig Harbor
The Bellingham Herald | Sunday, October 18, 2009
Opposition to referendum reminds of segregation
With the approach of the November election, opponents of Referendum 71 are citing everything from cultural tradition to religious and moral authority to explain their intention to vote against it - because it reaffirms the "everything but marriage" law recently passed by the state Legislature.
- Garland Richmond, Bellingham
The News Tribune | Sunday, October 18, 2009
R-71: Your neighbors just want basic rights
My partner of 18 years and I have lived in Gig Harbor since 1991. As I drive around the area, going to the Costco or the YMCA, I am seeing signs for the Reject Referendum 71 campaign. This saddens me.
- Rex Davison, Gig Harbor
Bainbridge Island Review | Friday, October 16, 2009
Equal rights for all American citizens
Our Constitution clearly states that we are all created equal and yet here we are in 2009, once again voting on whether our gay citizens should have equal rights. It is appalling.
- Ellen Lockert, Bainbridge Island
West Seattle Herald | Friday, October 16, 2009
Response to Ref. 71 article
I'm writing in response to Steve Shay's article about Ref. 71 earlier this week. I want to say that Referendum 71 is not "the latest assault to marriage" as he notes a member of the opposition stated, but rather it is just a continuation of rights that are already in place, rights that should belong to each member of any life-long committed relationship.
- Lauren Myers, Tacoma
Seattle Times | Friday, October 16, 2009
Voting yes will truly protect our children
A few months ago, when this referendum was still in the signature-collecting stages, I came across an article comment that has stuck with me throughout this referendum process. I believe it encompasses exactly for what we are fighting.
- Kara Gallemore, Fall City
Seattle Times | Friday, October 16, 2009
Human rights are not a ballot initiative
Just last year, after living in Seattle for eight years, I returned to California. At that time, the battle of Proposition 8 was heating up. I returned to a state full of hatred and anger. It became open season on the gay community.
- Karen Hedberg, Palm Springs, Calif.
Seattle Times | Friday, October 16, 2009
Liver and onions
I am a married, straight male. I know that two men or two women in a committed relationship to each other will not harm my marriage or anyone else's marriage, either current or future.
- Robert L. Stewart, Renton
Seattle Times | Friday, October 16, 2009
We will continue this fight for equal rights
As we come closer to the vote on Referendum 71, I start to think about the facts.
- Chris Boone, Seattle
Seattle Times | Friday, October 16, 2009
A little less time preaching
Those so-called religious leaders working to repeal the law securing partnership rights for all Washington citizens ought to spend a little less time preaching against gays and a little more time rereading the gospel message of the man they claim to follow.
- Dan Murphy, Everett
Puget Sound Business Journal | Friday, October 16, 2009
Ref. 71: Yes to healthy families and economy
Washington voters can help foster healthy communities by voting Nov. 3 to approve Referendum 71. Upholding the domestic partnership law will protect Washington families and show fairness to all citizens regardless of sexual orientation, while protecting our economy.
- Kate Joncas and Lyn Tangen
West Seattle Herald | Friday, October 16, 2009
Accept Ref. 71
We are a gay couple in a 16-year committed relationship. We raised a son together as full-time parents. We were active PTSA members and officers. We own and maintain a home together. In short we do all the things a 'traditional' family does.
- Dan Jensen and Terry Williams, Scenic Heights (Charlestown)
Seattle Times | Friday, October 16, 2009
Don't take step backward in quest for equality
We take exception to the premise that providing equal rights and protection under the law for gays and lesbians constitutes special rights.
- Jerry and Sue Howson, Des Moines
Seattle Time | Friday, October 16, 2009
The push against gay benefits
Basic civil rights for all citizens of the state, including gay couples, are not special rights ["The leaders behind push to undo gay benefits," page one, Oct. 14]. The law that Larry Stickney and Gary Randall are trying to overturn merely provides equal legal protection for all domestic partners who are currently denied the right to marry.
- Michael Carr, Seattle
The News Tribune | Thursday, October 15, 2009
R-71: Vote shouldn't be based on ignorance
Re: "Don't be swayed by guilt trip arguments" (letter, 10-9). The author wrote that he believes voters should not concern themselves with the arguments offered by either side of the issue. ...When was it that ignorance became a basis upon which to vote?
- Dean Uribe, Olympia
The Bellingham Herald | Thursday, October 15, 2009
Shares thoughts on ballot measures
Initiative 1033 and Referendum 71 are insidious measures, in my opinion. In their own way they denigrate our lifestyle to the maximum degree if we vote the wrong way.
- Adrienne Lederer, Bellingham
The Daily Evergreen | Thursday, October 15, 2009
Homosexual couples deserve equal rights
I find it shocking that in the United States, a country that has seen so much progress in civil rights, there is such a large group of people that will stop at nothing to deny the rights of same-sex couples.
- Derek Held, Junior in Computer Science
The Columbian | Thursday, October 15, 2009
Accept current law; approve R-71
The state law giving same-sex couples equal rights of a domestic partnership to married spouses is already here. SB 5688 was signed into law in May 2009. And nothing disastrous or devastating has happened. The sky hasn't fallen.
- Eva Luchini, Camas
The Olympian | Thursday, October 15, 2009
Referendum not about same-sex marriage
For years now opponents to same sex relationships have been arguing that they are not in favor of calling domestic partnerships "marriages" but, that they do support rights for all families. Clearly they have been less than honest about their intent and ultimate goal.
- Desi Saylors, Olympia
The News Tribune | Thursday, October 15, 2009
R-71: Gay marriage would be a boon for economy
After listening to the no on Referendum 71 ads on radio, I am left wondering why its sponsors want us to vote no.
- Jim Borah, Tacoma
The News T fribune | Thursday, October 15, 2009
R-71: 'Protect marriage'? Does it need protection?
A letter writer suggests we not be swayed by either side but to vote our "gut feeling" (TNT, 10-9). My gut feeling is that "all people are created equal" and perhaps should be treated that way.
- Catherine North, Federal Way
Ballard Nrd News-Tribune | Thursday, October 15, 2009
Why I support, approve Ref. 71
In addition to protecting gay families who are denied the right to marry, the domestic partnership law provides protection to older hetrosexual couples where one partner is at least 62 years of age.
- Ian Anderson, RN, Greenwood
Ballard News-Tribune | Thursday, October 15, 2009
Approve Ref. 71
My wife and I are passionate about equality. We often remark on how sad and silly it would be if we had been born different genders. Our rights as a couple would be different in many parts of the country. Luckily, Washington already has a great domestic partnership law. Unluckily, it's under threat this fall.
- Nick Lesiecki, Ballard
Seattle Times | Tuesday, October 13, 2009
My marriage doesn't need protecting, thank you
It seems a little ironic that people who left their own country because of religious persecution feel free to persecute others in this country because of their sexual orientation.
- Maggie Hart, Lake Forest Park
Seattle Times | Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Slavic evangelicals should show more mercy
Some of the same folks who likely emigrated from Russia to escape state-sanctioned oppression and curtailment of basic human rights, and to enjoy the American promise of tolerance and freedom, are working hard to ensure those benefits are withheld from a substantial portion of Americans.
- Faren Bachelis, Shoreline
Seattle Times | Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Just think
As Slavic evangelicals take to the streets with their signs to reject R-71, I have one request: Think.
- Teresa Dix, Mount Vernon
Seattle Times | Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Sad irony seen in minority group
It was disheartening to read The Seattle Times article of the several hundred demonstrators who descended on Lynnwood to protest Referendum 71...Is there any difference between a dictator and a religious group telling people how they should live their lives?
- Louise Nadeau, Lake Forest Park
The News Tribune | Tuesday, October 13, 2009
R-71: Acknowledge our collective humanity
A recent letter writer urges us to feel no guilt in voting to reject Referendum 71 (TNT, 10-9). We should ignore centuries of human progress, basing our vote on a primitive urge rather than making a thoughtful, informed decision that acknowledges our collective human dignity.
- Rudolph Henry, Tacoma
The News Tribune | Tuesday, October 13, 2009
R-71: Nation's culture has evolved, hasn't it?
There was a time in our nation when it was acceptable to force your wife to have sex, when blacks were lower than whites and when women were considered second-class citizens. Children were promised to others for marriage, and molestation was a problem kept quiet. However, our culture has evolved with time.
- Sais Singh, Sumner
The Columbian | Monday, October 12, 2009
Approve referendum to enact law
Referendum 71 must be approved for fairness and justice. We have always had reactionary citizens who think they know what is best for others. In earlier times, those who persecuted others as witches in the name of God destroyed lives and spread nothing but fear in their misguided attempts to be pious.
- Carol Patterson, Vancouver
The News Tribune | Sunday, October 11, 2009
R-71: Same-sex couple shows real family values
Re: "R-71 would help protect Washington's families - lies - like mine" (Viewpoint, 10-8). We found it both humorous and troubling that our dear friend Laurie Jinkins had a such a touching Viewpoint article about her and Laura's family on the same day that you reported about the Baptist minister who was making obscene phone calls to a nearby coffee shop.
- Linda Shaffer & Walt Waisath, Jr., Tacoma
The Western Front | Friday, October 9, 2009
Approve Referendum 71
The Domestic Partnership law is about equality for every resident of Washington and it is NOT marriage. The legislators that we voted into office approved an expansion of benefits earlier this year-Senate Bill 5688. Now a small group of individuals want to overturn this and deny basic rights to same-sex couples and heterosexual couples over the age of 62. To vote to deny these rights is a slap in the face to thousands of Washingtonians who are your friends, family neighbors, classmates and professors.
- Nick Milhoan, Western junior, Chair of Bellingham Pride Festival
West Seattle Herald | Friday, October 9, 2009
West Seattle clergy urge passage of Ref. 71
As religious leaders of West Seattle, we have come together to speak with one voice for all families. Religious leaders before us have spoken to end slavery, and to ensure equal rights to all persons regardless of gender, nationality, religion, and race. Today, we feel compelled to speak out in support of Washington's domestic partnership law, which provides essential protections to families throughout the state.
Rev. Kendall Baker, Retired, United Church of Christ
Rev. Peg Boyle Morgan, Westside Unitarian Universalist Congregation
Rev. Dr. Joanne Carlson Brown, Tibbetts Methodist Church
Rev. Diane Darling, Alki Congregational United Church of Christ
Rev. Ann J. Eidson, Admiral Congregational Church
Rev. David Kratz, Fauntleroy United Church of Christ Church
Rabbi Anson Laytner, Congregation Kol HaNeshamah
Rev. Mark Newton, Westside Unitarian Universalist Congregation
Rev. Paul Winterstein, Calvary Lutheran Church
The Columbian | Thursday, October 8, 2009
Vote for civil rights; pass R-71
As YWCA Clark County's executive director, I ask Washington voters to please vote "yes" on Referendum 71. Your vote preserves the domestic partnership law that has already been passed by our state legislature and signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire. This law expands the rights of registered gay and lesbian domestic partnerships. It also applies to heterosexual partnerships when one partner is at least 62.
- Kathy Kniep, Vancouver
Seattle Times | Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Freedom of self determination
Our country was founded on the equality of all men and women. Why should that change based upon the sexuality of the individuals?
- Kim Driscoll, Bellevue
Seattle Times | Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Our species will be just fine
For the life of me, I fail to understand how gay marriage could be a threat to traditional marriage.
- C. Wight Reade, Seattle
Seattle Times | Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Opponents of R-71 selfish?
The Times Sunday front-page headline "Stakes high in fight over gay rights" is only partially correct. The stakes are certainly high for the gay and lesbian community. If Referendum 71 is defeated, they lose an opportunity to gain the dignity, happiness and peace of mind that the rest of us take for granted.
- David G. Gardner, Seattle
Tri-City Herald | Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Referendum 71: Approve I am writing in support of Referendum 71, and asking my fellow community members to vote to approve the expanded domestic partner rights in Washington state.
- Brian Griffith, Pasco
Bellingham Herald | Monday, October 5, 2009
Urges passage of Referendum 71
If Referendum 71 isn't approved, it will be a major step in the wrong direction for all Washington families. All of us should be treated equally and fairly under the law. Approve Referendum 71.
- Sarah Hinton, Bellingham
Kitsap Sun | Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Approving R-71 Is an Act of Respect and Love
I choose to think voting to approve R-71 is not only granting equal civil and human rights to our fellow citizens, but is a moral act of respect and love. I recall from my days in Sunday school, of the three important elements in a person's character, "the greatest of these is love." I plan to acknowledge that precept by voting to approve R-71.
- Robert J. Dietz, Bremerton
South Whidbey Record | Friday, October 2, 2009
Protecting law means voting yes
The letter by Hal Seligson in Saturday's paper really gives all the right reasons for supporting Washington families. However, his call to action was contrary. For the Domestic Partnership Law to remain intact we must vote to APPROVE Referendum 71.
- Grethe Cammermeyer, Langley
Tri-City Herald | Thursday, October 1, 2009
R-71: Yes
If Referendum 71 isn't approved, it will be a major step in the wrong direction for all Washington families. All of us should be treated equally and fairly under the law. Approve Referendum 71.
- Mark Lee, Kennewick
The Columbian | Friday, October 2, 2009
Voice reasoned protest
I'm constantly amazed by the letters to the editor. While everyone should be able to voice their opinion, the lack of logic is sometimes astounding.
- William R. Marsh, Vancouver
The Edmonds Beacon | Thursday, October 1, 2009
Keep protections in place
I love Edmonds. I have lived here for over 40 years and the last 20 with my life-partner. We own our home, and we have great neighbors, two dogs and a cat.
- Melissa Barran and Jo Ann Hartline, Edmonds
The Olympian | Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Nation proved it can move in new direction
Vote APPROVE on Referendum 71 to retain Washington's already granted domestic partnership benefits. This law allows gay, lesbian and heterosexual partners all civil rights of partnership. It is a matter of social justice and moral equity to do so. People of good conscience will vote "yes" with you.
- Barbara J. Monda, Olympia
Snoqualmie Valley Record | Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Referendum 71 should be approved
The Washington State Legislature recently passed legislation, signed by the governor, to expand the rights of those in registered domestic partnerships recognized by the state. ...I urge those of us in the Snoqualmie Valley who care about protecting all families in Washington to vote to approve Referendum 71!
- Janet Sailer, North Bend
Seattle Times | Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Not just a concept of protection
It's strange to think I can live in a state where some of the most influential people whom I hold higher than myself, such as teachers, friends or future leaders, cannot exercise the same civil rights I have.
- Julee Felts, Shoreline
Seattle Times | Tuesday, September 29, 2009
We must correct Euroct Europe's muddled mess
The Times performed a great service in reminding the public to get out and vote for R-71 in order to maintain equality in our democracy ["Broad support to approve R-71," Opinion, Sept. 25].
- Harold R. Pettus, Everett
The Columbian | Monday, September 28, 2009
Vote 'yes' on Referendum 71
During the 28 years we've been in a loving, committed relationship, we've worked at challenging jobs, paid taxes, voted, maintained our home, volunteered in community service projects, participated in religious observances, taken care of each other, our children and now our perfectly glorious grandson. We worry about the economy, our home's value and our retirement accounts. As senior citizens, we finally collect Social Security and actually get discounts at the movies.
- Harriet Forman and Claire Fulenwider, Vancouver
The Olympian | Saturday, September 26, 2009
Civil rights shouldn't be put to a vote
The editorial staff of The Olympian, hiding behind an appeal to democracy in "Let the voters decide," are actually advocating institutionalized bigotry and discrimination. Referendum 71 should not be on the ballot because civil rights are a matter of what is just, not whether a minority can sway the opinion of a disinterested majority.
- Lee Haugen, Olympia
The News Tribune | Thursday, September 24, 2009
R-71: Vote to dismantle unjust prejudice
As a fair-minded and educated individual, I want to tell the community at large about the necessity to approve Referendum 71.
- Mary C. Otterness, Federal Way
Kitsap Sun | Wednesday, September 23, 2009
R-71 Isn't Just a Gay Issue
Lest the debate on retaining Washington's domestic partnership law be hijacked by side issues typified by that inflammatory euphemism, "sexual preferences," we must remember that, in this case, the phase "domestic partnerships" applies to any loving, committed couple that for cultural reasons (if they are of the same gender), or financial reasons (if they are straight and one partner is at least 62 years old), cannot enjoy the benefits of a legal marriage.
- Nancy Frank, Bremerton
The Daily Evergreen | Monday, September 21, 2009
Referendum 71 is about more than gay marriage
While I applaud Peter Wagner's column encouraging the approval of Referendum 71, I think it's important for people to think not only about this law in terms of the couples, but in terms of families as well.
- Dustin Hall, Pullman
South Whidbey Record | Monday, September 14, 2009
[Rejection of] Referendum 71 will bring collateral damage
In the waging of war, we call it collateral damage. In the politics of plebiscites we call it the law of unintended consequences.
- Hal Seligson, Langley
The Columbian | Sunday, September 20, 2009
Two ballot issues are important
I believe in health care reform because all people - not just the lucky ones - should have access to basic health care...A "No" vote on Referendum 71 would reject this year's extended gay-rights* legislation and take away critical rights, including some related to health care, from thousands of families. I urge a "Yes" vote on Referendum 71.
-Allie Denny, Vancouver *Ed. note: Heterosexual seniors in domestic partnerships were also extended those critical rights.
The Olympian | Friday, September 18, 2009
Referendum 71 is all about fairness
I have been a lifetime Washingtonian. Though I have traveled the world, this is the state my family has called home since the 1850se 1850s. I am a conservative. I work hard and believe everyone should work and earn their way. I have a strong belief in God and enjoy a country that provides freedom for our religious beliefs.
- Nola Leyde, Yelm
Bellingham Herald | Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Calls for support of Referendum 71
Please vote to approve Referendum 71. I'm not sure why anyone would oppose it. It is not about gay marriage. In fact, it's really not about gay anything.
- Marti Leviel, Bellingham
The News Tribune | Sunday, September 13, 2009
R-71: Gay rights allies must not be silent
To paraphrase Edmund Burke, "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good citizens do nothing." In the face of the latest fear-based initiative to strip away human rights from gay men and lesbian women (Referendum 71), it is time for all allies of gays and lesbians to stand up.
- E. Duane Wilkerson, Executive Director Pierce County AIDS Foundation
Everett Herald | Saturday, September 12, 2009
Vote yes to keep law, protections
I love Edmonds. I have lived here for over 40 years and the last 20 with my life partner. We own our home, and we have great neighbors, two dogs and a cat.
- Melissa Barran & Jo Ann Hartline, Edmonds
Columbian | Saturday, September 12, 2009
Referendum 71
Discrimination means you are all alone in the world. You are a Jew in 1940 Germany, a black person in 1890 Mississippi, a Christian in Iraq, or a married gay couple in California (the victims of Proposition 8).
- Larry Little, Vancouver
Seattle Times | Monday, September 7, 2009
For the love of families, support extended partnership rights
Thanks for your editorial in support of all Washington families ["Basic fairness, equality for Washington families," editorial, Sept. 2]. To voters who would deny me and my family equal rights, I'm not afraid to let you know who I am. - Cathie Bachy, Seattle
Seattle Times | Monday, September 7, 2009
A loving home, a life among discrimination
I will be voting to approve Referendum 71 to provide legal protections for couples and families like mine. My same-sex wife - we were married in Canada - and I are raising two children. Our son is a special-needs child, and our daughter is an honor student who will be a high-school junior this year.
- Nancy Suppe, Bothell
Seattle Times | Friday, September 4, 2009
Washington is a place of equality
I was elated to read your editorial ["Basic fairness, equality for Washington families," Opinion, Sept. 2] encouraging voters to approve Referendum 71, upholding the domestic-partnership law, when it comes to the ballot this fall.
- Tucker Cholvin, Snohomish
Seattle Times | Thursday, September 3, 2009
Washington led for women's rights, now for gay rights
I support Referendum 71. It is fair and correct to affirm the rights of Washington's gay and lesbian families. The United States Constitution was written for the people, not just married people, not just single people. For everybody.
- Scott Leopold, Everett
Seattle Times | Thursday, September 3, 2009
My marriage doesn't need saving from same-sex 'threat'
For the life of me, I cannot conceive of how marriage betwge between two people of the same gender could be of any threat to my 50-year marriage; it doesn't need any "defense of marriage" group's help.
- Martin Paup, Seattle

We are 11 days away from the November Election. The Portland, Maine office is humming with volunteer activity. Every day, volunteers drop off food provisions for all the other volunteers. The first day we had homemade chili, yesterday egg salad sandwiches, and this morning someone brought in some carrots from their own yard. Mainers are chipping in any way they can. My time has bem their own yard. Mainers are chipping in any way they can. My time has been spent in the office working in the communications department while Travis Prinslow and Meleanie Altaras have been adopted into the Data and Campus Outreach departments. We work 9 to 9, when we're lucky and have been working on a variety of projects. From confirming volunteers, to getting people to vote early and in person volunteer recruitment. The amount of work that goes into a campaign is astounding. You walk into any office and you hear typing, people on the phone, stapling, paper shuffling and people being directed. It's a small preview of what Oregon will be dealing with soon enough. However, Oregon's fight will be much larger-- Maine's population is a third the size of Oregon's. I'm grateful that Basic Rights Oregon is starting early and getting all our ducks in a row before we enter our own fight. Maine's latest YouTube celebrity goes by the name of Phillip Spooner. Mr. Spooner is 85 years old, a WWII vet, and a lifelong republicanâ€"he is also in favor of marriage equality. Click here to watch his testimony in April during the Marriage hearings. His video has officially gone viral, with close to 500,000 views. Mainers are excited to have someone like Mr. Spooner speaking up for equality, so much so that he has unofficially become the face of the campaign. Click here to watch a segment of Mr. Spooner being interviewed about his views on Marriage Equality. The opposition is using children to scare voters into voting against equality. They are running ads claiming that "gay sex education" will be taught in schools. Fortunately, the Maine campaign has been very diligent about countering their ads and has caused a stir by featuring a French catholic woman who supports her son's right to get married. Yolande Dumont is also a Maine celebrity and has inspired Catholics and other religious denominations to come out and support the No on 1 campaign. Of course the Catholic DIoces is bankrolling the opposition's campaign along with National Organization marriage and Shubert Flint of prop 8 fame. When Yolande first came on the airwaves the Catholic Diocese was up in arms and started to spend resources countering Yolande's message. This is exciting because the opposition is now on the defensive. Not only do they have to counter multiple legislators, and educators on the whole "Teaching gay in Schools" issue, now they have to make sure that other fair minded Catholics reject Yolande's message. If the No on 1 Campaign wins on Election Day it will be a model on how to defeat the oppositions' vitriol and lies. Although, Maine is literally the farthest place from Oregon in the country, their efforts will have a huge impact on our work. They need all the help they can get. If you have not donated to the NO on 1 campaign you can do so by clicking here. If you cannot afford a donation but have some extra time on your hands you can phone bank from Oregon with their Call for Equality Program sign up here. I'm going to get back to work now but feel free to shoot me an email if you have any questions about getting involved in the Maine campaign. In solidarity, Alejandro Juarez Communications Coordinator Basic Rights Oregon (503) 222-6151 x 105 alejandro@basicrights.org

Listen to www.GayTalkRadio.org

GLBTQ

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Combined Gay News Headlines (T5T-1)

No comments:

Blog Roll

Links

Blog Archive