Saturday, October 10, 2009

Combined Gay News Headlines (T5T-1)

Rush Limbaugh, who only needed a few hours to call the president's Nobel Peace Prize win a "greater embarrassment" than losing the Olympics, is looking to secure a new title of his own: Owner of the St. Louis Rams. Only problem? The league's black players want nothing to do with the guy. We don't blame [...]
Support for civil unions for gays is up to 57 percent of Americans, says new poll data released by the Pew Research Center conducted in August with more than 4,000 people. That's a increase from last year's 54 percent and 2003's 45 percent. But what about full marriage rights? CONTINUED » Permalink | 4 comments | Add [...]
SOUNDBITES — "President Barack Obama is scheduled to speak Saturday night at a fundraising event for the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a far-left lobbying group that promotes forcing Americans to accept and applaud homosexual behavior. The group regularly lobbies to force Americans to affirm homosexuality and targets youth with weekly "Queerly Speaking" YouTube videos to [...]
Harvey Milk used to call them “un” leaders in his campaign speeches.  Leaders but not.  Milk was referencing the type of gay leader that was more inclined and interested in serving themselves or their own petty agendas than getting about the work of the community.  Harvey recoiled and often rebuked, sometimes very publicly, any community [...]
As reluctant as I am to say this President Obama has yet to show the American public that he is capable of being Commander in Chief. He just isn’t presidential enough and he has yet to induce some sense of presidential aurora that his predecessor portrayed. As difficult as it is for me to admit at least with former President Bush you knew [...]
I live in Tower District which also happens to be home the a relatively large but pleasant homeless population, a pack of wild dogs that chases anything with wheels and the local Planned Parenthood. Every so often I’ll pass by that conspicuously nondescript building and outside will be protesters, inevitably with children, holding signs saying [...]
While folks are marching in DC, don't forget that back in the other Washington, ballots are dropping and a class of people could lose their rights.  Sometimes is sucks to be right: Reject 71 has a sugar daddy after all.  Remember this prognostication?
On October 12th, two days before the state starts mailing out ballots to voters, a large donor ban goes into effect in Washington.  ...I think that [Protect Marriage Washington] has stopped asking for cash because they expect an external entity to buy big media time for them. ...Once those ads are on the air, at the time when we need cash the most, it'll be legally impossible for generous donors to give more [than $5,000]. ...

We all know how National Organization for Marriage and allied organizations have been riding roughshod over state campaign finance regulations in Iowa and Maine.  To them, the end (snuffing out legal protections for families) justifies the means (ignoring campaign laws).  All indications are that the same is about to happen here in Washington.  The only way to defend against this dirty plan is to CONTRIBUTE. NOW.  Before it's not possible to give more at the time it's needed most.

Well, it looks like I was right.  Details below the fold.  If you have the resources to give a gift over $5,000, you need to give now.  The most any individual can give after October 12th is $5,000.  Whatever your total giving ability is, please give any amount over $5,000 now.  All large donations must be in the WAFST campaign manager's hands by the end of the day Oct. 12th, so please give online if you can.  If you prefer to give by check, do not mail it because it will not reach the campaign in time.  Instead, email the campaign at donate@approve71.org and someone will come to pick up the check from you.  The campaign has people in Washington DC this weekend, so if you are reading this from DC, we can still pick up your check!

Small and medium donors, please be ready to step up to the plate.
Dominic over at SLOG has the details on the dirty.

Vote Reject R-71, a political action committee, registered with the state's Public Disclosure Commission yesterday to campaign against Referendum 71, thereby attempting to repeal the state's domestic-partnership law. (Read the filing paperwork here: .pdf.)

Dave Mortenson, a conservative campaign consultant who filed the PAC, says, "A bunch of individuals contacted me to see if we could raise some money really quick." He says, "I am not going to share who I've been talking to, but if we do get the money, we will report it." Are these religious groups, corporations, wealthy donors? "We are working them all," says Mortenson.

October 12 is the deadline for donations over $5000, according to state campaign rules.

Can the group raise a large sum of money before Tuesday? "I'm pretty optimistic, let me put it that way," says Mortensen, who has worked on Republican legislative campaigns since the 1980s.

At the moment, Protect Marriage Washington has raised $60K, while the Approve 71 groups Washington Families Standing Together and HRC Approve Referendum 71 have raised $779K and $73K, respectively.  The Approve 71 campaign anticipated this.  Here's their response:
Filing a new PAC is a "giant red flag" that anti-gay forces are about to dump loads of cash into the anti-gay Reject R-71 campaign, says WAFST campaign manager Josh Friedes. Much of the money for California's anti-gay Prop 8 came in the final weeks before the election.

"The filing of a PAC a few days before the cutoff suggests that this is a strategy to significantly fund an anti-gay campaign but have it cloaked in secrecy until such a time that that it is difficult to respond because of the state's campaign finance laws," says Friedes.

"We won't know until how much money is dumped in until after the cut-off, so it will be hard to make it up in smaller contributions," Friedes says. "Anybody who can donate over $5,000 should do so now."

In sharp contrast to Protect Marriage Washington's crass and cynical use of the state's campaign finance laws to cloak their funds, and their earlier attempts to hide the identity of their donors, WAFST has been clear and transparent in their financial reporting, proudly listing from day one the names of individual donors as required by state law.  Only bandits wear masks.
The author of the birther irther bill and a deranged opponent of hate crimes legislation gets The Rachel Maddow Show steamroller treatment. All they have to do is just play his own statements on the air...


In one of those "what does he really mean" moments, Joe Solmonese sent out an HRC e-blast to supporters that suggests he's willing to cut the President slack until he leaves office in 2017, after an assumed second term in office.

The missive could also be interpreted as cheerleading the passage of hate crimes as sufficient progress to celebrate for now. If this the message that is being telegraphed as the party line, it proves the org is definitely not in touch with the grassroots discussion out there about what the President needs to say tomorrow night.

Hate crimes is an accomplishment, but what would affect LGBT citizens most profoundly is if the President would state imminent movement on ENDA, or even DADT repeal. That's real progress. Surely he can say something about the battle going on in Maine to reverse marriage equality. None of this mentioned in this e-blast. And cutting slack until 2017, if that's indeed the message, means yet again, that those who have the luxury to wait (they have non-discrimination measures where they live and work), don't understand the day-to-day peril working LGBTs live under in terms the vulnerability of being fired or losing the chance for employment because of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.

That said, don't go by me; you parse this document and see if there's some other way to interpret this missive, passed along by Americablog.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Solmonese, Human Rights Campaign President <hrc@hrc.org>
Sent: Fri, Oct 9, 2009 5:00 pm
Subject: HRC Weekly Update from Joe Solmonese

Joe's Weekly Message
Dear xxxxx,

Sometimes life moves so quickly that you can forget how much is changing around you. But this weekend we will have a powerful reminder: President Obama's appearance at HRC's national dinner. His joining us that night says that although last year, we were outsiders to our own government, this year, we are a part of its vision.

It shouldn't be difficult to see why the president of the United States speaking to the nation's largest LGBT rights group is a good development for LGBT people. But at this point in time, it is hard for many among us to see. The substance of the feeling is this: he promised us the world, and we gave everything we had to elect him. But what has he done?
I've written that we have actually covered a good deal of ground so far. But I'm not going to trot out those advances right now because I have something more relevant to say: It's not January 19, 2017.

That matters for two reasons: first, the accomplishments that we've seen thus far are not the Obama Administration's record. They are the Administration's record so far. If you ask "is that all" my question to you is "is that all you think we're going to push for?" It isn't.

More importantly: today, and for the next seven years and three months, Barack Obama is the most powerful person in the world, with the largest bully pulpit, and the most power to effect change. To do the work, we hav e to work with our supporters in Congress and with the Administration. Whatever you think of the Administration's first nine months, you don't pass laws by sitting out. You pass laws by sitting at the table.

And you don't get to the table at the expense of your principles. You don't get the President's ear at the expense of your expectations. In June I wrote a letter to President Obama describing HRC's disagreement with his decision to defend DOMA in federal court, and with the offensive and inaccurate arguments the government put forth. It's hard to read such a letter—a public one—from an ally.

But when the President signed a memorandum providing family protections and an inclusive non-discrimination policy for federal employees—policies for which HRC and our sister organizations had advocated—I was proud to be present. Our disagreement about DOMA did not require me to ignore a step forward for transgender federal workers and for same-sex partners. In turn, the President invited me because he recognized HRC's accomplishments in promoting those fair policies, and because he would not exclot exclude a civil rights advocate for speaking up about our community's rights.

Those protections were a good first step. Passing the hate crimes law is a monumental one. I continue to believe that with this president, we will do much more. As we prepare to dedicate HRC's Edward Kennedy award, I know that this president shares his mentor's commitment to promoting justice for LGBT people.

I predict great things coming out of our work with this President, but that does not mean that I am satisfied today. Our community cannot be satisfied so long as DOMA is on the books and an inclusive ENDA is not. This is something we share with all those who advocate for civil rights. No civil rights advocate can be satisfied as long as there are children who eat their only meals in their failing schools each day. No civil rights advocate should be satisfied until all of us have health care and no one has to declare bankruptcy because of a hospital bill. We are not satisfied until this country keeps its promise to everyone.

Advocates for health care, education, LGBT rights and other civil rights issues are getting used to this new landscape, where passing our legislation is possible, but still hard. We've learned that end of life counseling can be twisted into "death panels" and hate crimes into "pedophile protection." We've come to understand that we didn't win it all in November but that we can win now.
I am sure of this: on January 19, 2017, I will look back on the President's address to my community as an affirmation of his pledge to be our ally. I will remember it as the day when we all stood together and committed to finish what Senator Kennedy called our unfinished business. And I am sure of this: on January 19, 2017, I will also look back on many other victories that President Barack Obama made possible.

Sincerely, 
joe_solmonese_signature_150
Joe Solmonese
President, Human Rights Campaign
PS: C-Span will cover President Obama's address live. Tune in on Saturday night at 7:55 p.m.And if you are travelling to DC to participate in the National Equality March, click here for details about the resources HRC will be providing, including the tools you need to become a citizen lobbyist, advocating for all of the rights that you came to march for. 

More below the fold, including a snippetsnippet of The Advocate's Kerry Eleveld column, "View from the Hill," about the dinner.


From View from the Hill, more evidence that the rah-rah at the dinner will focus on hate crimes passage:

 When I asked [Useless Press Secretary] Gibbs if the president would highlight anything beyond the recently nominated openly gay ambassador and the nearly sealed hate-crimes legislation, Gibbs said he didn’t want to “zoom past” the hate-crimes achievement. 

“Hate-crimes protections are long overdue, in the president's opinion,” Gibbs said. “He believes that their passage represents an important step, and looks forward to, when that legislation gets to his desk, signing it and making that the law of the land. I think that's certainly part of what he'll discuss on Saturday night.” 

Based on that response, I think it’s safe to say that hate crimes will clearly be a major emphasis of the speech. 

...Setting out a path to overturning the gay ban [DADT] on Saturday would certainly be noteworthy, but earlier this week, Gibbs’s reaction to questioning about a Senate sponsor for repeal or a timeline led me to believe that it hadn’t been a hot topic of conversation recently at the White House.
[CDATA[ 5f1Already six states embrace the freedom to marry. Will Oregon be next? How can we win marriage for same-sex couples in Oregon, and how long will it take?

Evan Wolfson is founder and Executive Director of Freedom to Marry, a national gay and non-gay partnership working to win marriage equality across the country. In 2004 TIME magazine named Wolfson one of the "100 most influential people in the world." Wolfson is the author of "Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality and Gay People's Right to Marry". He wrote the book on marriage, literally. Monday, November 2 6:00 PM SEIU Local 49 3536 SE 26th Ave. Portland, OR 9720 Tuesday, November 3 7:00 p.m. Old Stone Church in Bend 157 NW Franklin Ave. Light refreshments willll be served. Thank you to the following co-sponsors: Basic Rights Oregon Education Fund, Unitarian Universalists Fellowship of Central Oregon, Human Dignity Advocates of Crook County, GLBTbend.com, PFLAG Central Oregon, Human Dignity Coalition & Spice Trader Records Wednesday, November 4 6:00pm Eugene Public Library 100 W 10th Ave Eugene, OR 97401 Sponsored by the Eugene Public Library

Friday’s Mixed News Post Includes: News reports, Op-Ed’s on politics; the March in Washington; And more. Bizarre Crime Files: ROYAL gay blackmailer hosted champagne parties in his prison cell, it was claimed yesterday. Gay Marriage: - Same-sex deja vu in Maine — Maine same-sex marriage measure: Prop. 8 rerun. - Gay Marriage Question Posed To Maine AG (what [...]

Listen to www.GayTalkRadio.org

No comments:


If you wish, you may contact me by voicemail at 909-7GayGay (909.742.9429).

Alternately, you may fill out the form below; the voicemail system will call you.

This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is available in effort to advance understanding. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.