

Anyway, the actual point of this post is about the subsequent exchange among the CNNers. Poor John Roberts, who is only seven years older than I am, made this pop culture reference brought to mind by the absurd claim by Ty Toys:
ROBERTS: You know, I think the jury is still out on whether George Harrison copied "He's so Fine" when he wrote "My Sweet Lord" but this, I don't think so.I was appalled, not because they didn't have a clue, but that I was old enough to know exactly what he was talking about. Hill was born in 1976, and Cho may be in the same ballpark; both weren't even born when the late George Harrison got into legal hot water over the hit single, which appeared on the album All Things Must Pass, with the question being whether Harrison plagiarized the Chiffon's "He's So Fine."CHO: I don't know what you're talking about.
ROBERTS: Alina, thanks so much.
CHO: OK.
ROBERTS: Erica?
HILL: Yes, you lost me with that one, too, John, but we'll look it up in the break.
In the U.S. federal court decision in the case, known as Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music,[2] Harrison was found to have unintentionally copied the earlier song. He was ordered to surrender the majority of royalties from "My Sweet Lord" and partial royalties from All Things Must Pass. Former manager Allen Klein, who earlier had supported Harrison's case, became the owner of Bright Tunes, after they parted ways. In the long run this worked against Klein, but it resulted in the case continuing for years in court.Erica, Alina -- there's more history about the lawsuit here. Now John Roberts and I will go sit in our respective rocking chairs and talk about all those young whippersnappers.The Chiffons would later record "My Sweet Lord" to capitalize on the publicity generated by the lawsuit.
Shortly thereafter, Harrison (who would eventually buy the rights to "He's So Fine")[3] wrote and recorded a song about the court case named "This Song", which includes "This song, there's nothing 'Bright' about it." "I Can't Help Myself (Sugar Pie, Honey Bunch)" and "Rescue Me" are also mentioned in the record.
Q of the day: How many of you out there have had a real "generation gap" experience that you'd like to share?
Video of Harrison performing My Sweet Lord is below the fold.
In a post earlier this week, I commented that I was going to post a copy of MarriageEqualityUSA slideshow at the Equality Summit, entitled the Collective Wisdom of Our Grassroots Community (the link is to a PDF file of the PowerPoint slide show).
The PowerPoint slideshow was based on two written reports:
We Will Never Go Back; Grassroots Input on California's No on 8 Proposition 8 Campaign
Some of the thoughts from some of the slides:
Clergy leaders were underutilized by the No on 8 campaign. Clergy leaders, particularly those who had performed marriage ceremonies, were the best spokespeople to counter faith leaders used by the Yes on 8 campaign.
Over reliance on focus group findings directed clergy to phone banks, instead of visibility actions and outreach to congregations.
CA marriage case and now Prop 8 amicus briefs identified supportive clergy across California.
Leaders of color were underutilized by the No on 8 campaign. There is a deep bench of Leaders from the Black, Asian, Latino and Native American communities. We must have a campaign where all communities are well-represented as leaders, spokespeople, and in campaign literature.
"We need to engage with all people and not just people "like us"...to ensure we are not acting in unintentionally marginalizing or discriminatory ways." "I feel that some of the language used in the ads, particularly ?unfair and wrong? was very Caucasian centric. Most people of color live in a world that is unfair and wrong, so this washed right over us."
Funding to distribute Spanish and Asian language materials and ads were needed at the outset of the campaign.
We must make institutional changes so that the LGBTI leadership and organizations reflect the natural diversity of our communities.
No on 8 ads lacked heart and inexcusably excluded LGBTI people. Survey respondents and town hall participants agreed:
"The decision to ?hide? gay people was unacceptable." No on 8 messaging was "swift boated"by the Yes on 8 campaign.
No on 8 ads were too abstract and "lacked heart."
We can't take the personhood out of a human rights campaign.
In moving ahead, community input emphasized the need to present personal stories.
It goes without saying that I believe the slideshow is worth watching, and the reports are worth reading. Lots of good info in the collected thoughts.






No comments:
Post a Comment